Feasibility study for studio development at Ludham Basement

Proposal context

Over the last 6 months we have worked with architects Public Works to develop a feasibility study for bringing back to use derelict garages adjacent to our existing studios. This is supported through the GLA Good Growth Fund allocated for a Stage 1-3 RIBA feasibility study.

The proposed development, which is due to start in spring 2020 will see the space turned into up to 80 artist studios and work-spaces, including space for community-led activities and residents. The users of the space will include community groups that provide services for the local community, including the most marginalised.

Our community faces many challenges, which this project addresses, including:

  • High unemployment and/or low mean annual household income;

  • High % of residents with no qualifications;

  • Many residents are economically inactive due to ill-health and many adults and children depend on the social care system;

  • Stark segregation along Mansfield Road between an area with high level of deprivation on the south side, and to the north (Hampstead) with low level of deprivation, leading to stigmatisation of residents in social housing

  • Urban blight due to inadequate waste management facilities

Example of use

CAV (Camden Against Violence) and Urban Xtra Radio are looking to lease one of the double garages (24sqm) in order to move the radio station and set up a recording studio in Ludham Undercroft. CAV is very keen to collaborate with local projects and London School of Mosaic. Both organisations have identified that there is a real need to support community focused and volunteer led groups in the area, who are looking to tackle poverty and youth crime in a supportive and pro-active environment. Urban Xtra Radio work diligently within the community to improve opportunities and create pathways for young people within the media industry by providing courses, support and mentoring with a view to creating the stars, influencers and gatekeepers of tomorrow

Set up in 2001, Little Hands Design is a charity focused on providing hands on, fun-packed sessions for children and teenagers, teaching them how to develop a unique dress sense, become responsible consumers, and how to design and make clothes. They have a strong focus on sustainability through re-use, mending and altering to teach about the life cycle of clothes. A strong component of the charity is focused on exploring the links and impact of the fashion world on mental health, body image and selfworth. They rent the space at LSoM every Tuesday and Wednesday, some Saturdays and also days during the school holidays .

Artist studio: expression of interest

If you are interested in the project or want to register to our waiting list for studio spaces please click below:

The Vacuum of Power

The buffoon who holds today’s “top” job, as Prime Minister, has already experienced the strange vacuum of power. How he is on display, with all the mirage levers of power, but as he tries one lever he realises it does not work. Each lever has a series of people attached, and when they don’t agree with him or they ignore what he wants, or they pretend to be working on it – nothing happens!

Even when he pulls a lever and it works and the people do what was asked, it is THEY who exercise the power and he only watches them. Isn’t that why the portraits of Kings and Queens are sulky? It is a vacuum and his hands are tied.

The great hope for today’s top man is being the shortest time serving Prime Minister. That is what most people want and his last opportunity to fit in with a democratic mandate. Bovine Johnson the loser – what a legacy!

 What Bovine should avoid is breaking the law, being tempted to push the boundary in his direction and feeding his personal greed.

For therein lies a conundrum of modern liberal democracy. Very few around the Prime Minister will tell the truth, everyone wants to catch his attention, there are so many people pushing and shoving that he never has time to finish something off, before being whisked away for the next farcical foray. He only finds out later in the moments before turning lights out on another sleepless night, when he has minutes to watch the circular flow of media – if what he’s pooped has hit the fan and sends splatter.

The way the tramp across the pond deals with this is by shovelling daily loads of dung onto the fan blade, so the next flying flecks assault you, before you’ve had time to polish the last turd. What a fandango!

 So the world’s most backward liberal democracy: England (not written its constitution yet, although even little charities must do) – England should stop living on borrowed time. The muddling through is no longer acceptable. Kicking the can down the road has passed its usefulness. We can no longer excuse ourselves with the phrase “mother of parliaments”. It’s time to move on.

Let’s face the change: here are some major fault lines that need tackling:

  • those who seek power over others are the exact type who should not be allowed near the job.

  • How can we encapsulate our responsibilities to family, work, neighbourhood, country, humanity and the Earth?

  • What type of system can evolve that allows people to serve, in the interests of greater good?

  • Should we use technology and experiment with everyone voting on each major issue? And who would then define the major issues? Perhaps this could be trialled in Liverpool or Sunderland and people paid a basic dividend for their efforts?

Britain was the first country to experience a modern revolution – in the crucible of burning together Scotland, Ireland, England and Wales – the king lost his head and modern limited democracy was born.

Now is the time to consider how best to take a step away from the factional politics of the party system, where cliques arranged things to make life easy for land and property owners, merchants and corporations – the very people who least needed political support. We should have a system that is open, transparent and operates in the public interest, and is not peopled with twits seeking to make history.

 Real power has always lain with the people: the builders, farmers, cleaners and chefs who make the real world go around. Let’s sweep away the buffoons and put them into heritage’s display cabinet – the best place for them alongside Cyrus, Caesar, Cromwell, Napoleon, Stalin, Pol Pot and other irritating war lords of the past. There is only the difference between teeth – those with rotten or false teeth and the others with fangs.

 It is time for “might is right” to move off stage: go and watch the wrestling if you’re bored.

Exquisite Taste for Mosaic at Tate Modern

Over the past week London School of Mosaic achieved two firsts – our first recognised appearance at Tate Modern and a piece of our work was featured on the cover of Time Out , in a mosaic made with food waste. At Tate Modern we celebrated art at its finest, on the cover of Time Out we celebrated turning waste into a feast.

Time Out Cover 23rd-29th July 2019

Time Out Cover 23rd-29th July 2019

The link in between Mosaic and Food is intriguing, perhaps most poignantly within the sense that both are an art form in skilled hands and that their unfathomable neglect as art leads to waste and cultural loss.

The recent front cover of Time Out, featured mosaic made out of left-over food by London School of Mosaic artists Giulia Vogrig and Rada Stillanova.

The cover story gave us narratives from 15 London restaurants who create taste from waste and engage with the green circle of life – celebrating seasonal foods, zero-waste, eating grey squirrels, banning plastic from kitchens, using ingredients for cocktails and dishes made from the blossoms of local flora, composting thrown away food to provide the nutrients to grow ingredients for our next meal.

Green is the scene.

Each one of us who likes food, knows that a good meal, cooked with loving hands is part of the essence of conviviality. The aromas, sights, tastes, sounds, places where we eat, joining in the green movement for greater good, conversations surrounding our enjoyment - all these elements and more create memories that make life worth living. However, when we neglect to reverence food as an intrinsic part of the quality of life we risk the blight of obesity, waste of resources, diminution of value and in the worst case scenarios there is hunger and famine where greed causes poverty, through misplaced distribution of resource.

LSoM jelly mosaic.jpg

 Young people tasting the delights of mosaic at Tate Modern, both as a mosaic jelly and then designing and making mosaics with other artists from London School of Mosaic (LSoM).

In a curiously similar way, mosaic is neglected as an art form and yet it is all around us. Its ubiquity, simplicity and foundation of our built environment are so obvious that we forget bricks are put together in patterns to make our homes, slabs of concrete are laid to make pavements we walk on, pixels form the letters and images we read on computers, mosaic design is intrinsic to quality of life.

The word “Mosaic” comes from the Greek - Muse of Art. As an original floor and decoration for villas, palaces and temples, it inspired the sculpture and architecture that was part of the Middle Eastern, African and European miracle of art in Sumerian, Egyptian, Greek, Roman and Arabian cultures. For ancient foot trails, the patterning of pebbles and stones symbolised how working with nature, using the riches of colours and materials, we made stepping stones that led us across rivers, through impenetrable forests and terrain, creating pathways, bridges and roads that led to civilisation.

These days we sense we have taken aspects of civilisation too far. Our plundering of nature, reliance on the bottom line, promotion of competition over cooperation, developing systems that fight and destroy each other in gangs and nations, rather than promoting alliances, sharing skills, working as part of landscapes within Mother Nature, seeing other humans as rivals for dominion over resources, rather than partners in unity – has led us to thoughts and concerns about extinction. Our own history of making desert out of the original Garden of Eden (in modern day Iraq), eliminating most mega fauna across the earth and ocean, the rise and fall of every empire that existed, going so far as surveys of today’s workers where 70% of people dislike their job: these are the dilemma’s that bring us back to basics and remind us to make art, create beauty and live in harmony.

London School of Mosaic has been sponsored by Nesta’s Arts Impact Fund and thank them for their faith in our social impact and viability as an enterprise. We have succeeded in uniting old and new, ancient and contemporary, every continent on earth where mosaic is practised, re-establishing the foundations of culture that challenge austerity’s brutal minimalism. We champion the channelling of resources away from conflict and waste, towards cooperation, creativity and inclusion.

At London School of Mosaic we work in cooperation with others. We particularly welcome our partnership with Public Works Group of architects  who are leading our efforts to bring back empty space at our premises in Camden. We celebrate our collaboration with Dr Will Wootton from Kings College London who lectures on Roman art and has specialist knowledge on ancient mosaics, sharing this with our audience at Tate Modern, and we thank artists like Joseph Moss, who choose to use mosaic in their work and champion its revival as a serious art form.

Whorlton Hall Hospital symbolises all that’s toxic in England

Sometimes things are so in front of our eyes that we fail to see them. Hidden perhaps more easily by the weariness of the British press addicted to their own peculiar opioids. The insults thrown around Parliament are neatly and repugnantly laid bare in the way people with special needs have been treated at Whorlton Hall Hospital. It fits with the UN’s special rapporteur Philip Alston, who described the shape of today’s workhouse Britain, where millions of citizens are immiserating as working poor, attending foodbanks and broken hearted over the poverty of their children. Such is the triumph of austerity, neatly promoted by our supplicant press, that we as readers pass by on the other side. The way our country operates, our parliamentary democracy, is not fit for purpose. This house of insult, as parliament is bemusedly called by its own staff, should be unveiled as a revolting place where people who are self-serving and greedy disrespect the few troubadours of truth among their number.

The system is at fault. It attracts the murderous, devious and avaricious. It rewards lick spittle’s and puling ladder climbers: those apologists of empire and loquacious laziness who will cast any insult if you pay them. It makes bold the cowardly back room boys who think the history of our world is the cannon of war. It’s time to change the story-line.

We should recognise that the history of war is primarily the holocaust of innocents and that most people caught in its clutches were unfortunates, dupes or sadists. We should understand that aside from those mad with violence, the major system fault is our acceptance of the insatiable acquisition of material advantage over others: namely greed. This greed produces monsters who tumble for words to eulogise their own polished turds.

If we create institutions like Whorlton Hall and Parliament, then we prolong our misery and trumpet our own extinction.

Democracy will renew itself by making the people sovereign, by giving six year olds the vote, by understanding our nature is intrinsically good when we find the means and methods to allow its flourishing. And we will do this when we intelligently distribute resources and ensure students and citizens enjoy their education, understand that public and private should be for the greater good and leave behind this “carceral mentality” that is so keen on debt and punishment and stamping out joy. A plague on both your houses: parliament and Whorlton Hall. We are looking forward to the time when we can breathe clean air again while walking on our dales and swimming once more in clear plastic free seas.

Norman Mosaics in Sicily

The UNESCO world heritage sites in Sicily are crowned by a unique series of iconic mosaics associated with the Normans. They ruled the Mediterranean island from conquest in 1091 following the siege of Palermo for a little more than a century. Roger II, son of the conqueror of Sicily, established a Kingdom and he was responsible for starting much of the unique building of Norman mosaics in Sicily, creating a tolerant society that blended attributes from Byzantine, Romanesque, Arabic and Norman-French influences.

marta5.jpg

Mosaics in the Church of the Martorana

Palermo, Sicily

In 1184 Ibn Jubair wrote about the Norman King William II of Sicily:

“The attitude of the king is really extraordinary. His attitude towards the Muslims is perfect: he gives them employment, he choses his officers among them, and all, or almost all, keep their faith secret and can remain faithful to the faith of Islam. The king has full confidence in the Muslims and relies on them to handle many of his affairs, including the most important ones, to the point that the Great Intendant for cooking is a Muslim.”

The key sites around the city of Palermo are Monreale (at 6000 sq metres the largest mosaic in the world), Capella Palatino, the Martorana and outside the capital city the cathedral of Cefalu. In these buildings there is a blend of styles (Arab, African and European) with innovative techniques exploring the way mosaic portrays biblical stories, for a largely illiterate audience. You can imagine a farmer coming into a cathedral and being dazzled by visual fragrance, their belief in God confirmed by the evidence of beauty and wealth, the soft approach to explaining power: who could ever have made such brilliance without divine blessing?

If the Normans in Sicily achieved magnificent harmony, their successors whether German, French or Spanish were often characterised by corruption and exploitation of indigenous working people. Local self-defence militias formed to protect residents from arbitrary harm. Absentee landlords often gave control over their affairs to hired help. Local militias hit back against corruption by challenging the nobility in their fiefdoms.

The lesson for us all, perhaps, is that acceptance and cooperation, the seeing of talents in others, (rather than stoking fears about their differences), the welcoming of migrants from abroad with their fresh ideas and skills, enriches culture. Where they bring their ideas into an atmosphere of toleration then unique fusions and blends occur which adorn a culture for generations to come.

Housing crisis: Confiscation back on the table?

Here at the London School of Mosaic we have a strong interest in housing. Over the years we have worked with many social housing tenants, i.e. by decorating their estates and in exchange offer them mosaic making skills, while also helping homeless people on their way into employment and housing.

As the rulers above us rain down their chaos, we may reflect how the boys from Eton fight over taking back control: their hubris like babies in high chairs waiting for nanny’s feed.

It gives us an opportunity to clear the decks of arcane rituals and put into place clear guidelines for government based on firm foundations.

We’re told we live in a property owning democracy – so let’s realise this and free ourselves from the Lilliputians who tie us down with their silly red tape.

This land of such dear souls, this dear, dear land,
Dear for her reputation through the world,
Is now leased out - I die pronouncing it -
Like to a tenement or pelting farm
England, bound in with the triumphant sea,
Whose rocky shore beats back the envious siege
Of watery Neptune, is now bound in with shame,
With inky blots and rotten parchment bonds.
That England that was wont to conquer others
Hath made a shameful conquest of itself. (Shakespeare)

As we are on the cusp of radical change, let’s make our foundations more secure and re-evaluate our relationship to property. Simply put: we should take property out of the market and secure it into the sanctuary of sovereignty. We should make the people sovereign over land and property and stop this horse trading of assets which promotes profiteering and greed.

Property and buildings are evidence of what a community can achieve when working together. Whether they are historic churches, mosques or temples, castles or cathedrals, mansions and town houses, farms or bridges – these are the genuine assets bequeathed to our generation through the lineage of our predecessors. No building was every put up by one person and few if any bankers ever laid even one brick. The swirling chaos of our current systems, with sky thieves building their ever taller Towers of Babel, evidenced in the debacle of parliament in Spring 2019, which has led to our children being priced out of property. This should stop! The debt slavery that is flooding us, hosed over us by fools of financial liquidity, should be staunched.

When the people become sovereign of land and property in England, the aim will be to give them a right to a home from the age of 21.  With this right comes responsibilities:

  • To use the place (any empty or wasted property is charged double)

  • To keep the property in good condition: roof, electrics, plumbing and exterior decoration

For those with more than 10 properties, then confiscation comes back onto the table, unless there is a commitment to the social housing model and tenants accept this. We’ve tried the private housing model and it has led us to this chaos.

There will be no rights to fleece others for money from renting at exorbitant rates. All rents should be capped at social levels: £300 per month for one bedroom and £400 per month for three bedrooms may be a benchmark. The precise amounts can be quibbled over when details are worked out.

Confiscation of excessive properties avoids punishment. In evolutionary terms and under market conditions, it is recognition that rentiers have made a wrong investment choice and therefore lose the surplus they have accumulated against the public interest. It also recognises they have not technically committed crime: they have just practised “greed”, which is re-instated as an original wrong choice (sin).

And with the people as sovereign we can then introduce (gradually) the citizen’s dividend. Paying every person, baby, adult, grandma £1000 a month before we work. This can be sorted out by using an algorithm to raise land & property value tax. The advantage of this is that land and property do not move around off-shore banks, but stay put and can be easily assessed and regulated.

Interestingly, land value tax is part of England’s history, when William the Conqueror came and introduced this, to pay for his castles and cathedrals, which remain with us as legacies creating jobs and visitor attractions to our own time. Good system, tried and tested – so no worries about precedent, or need for inflated fantasies about chaos and revolution. Simply re-using a sensible system and moving forward with the people as sovereign.

Studying Mosaic and being part of its Renaissance

One of the intriguing consequences of being in the first cohort of students to take a diploma/degree in Mosaic Studies will be when you graduate you will be at the forefront of knowledge about the subject.

Although I generally disagree with Hobbes the 17th century philosopher and writer of Leviathan, on this point and in terms of our mosaic programme, he was right (I paraphrase) when he suggested the new generation are more knowledgeable than their elders, because they learn from their parents’ generation and then share and add their own experience as well.

In a too-long neglected subject such as Mosaic Studies, this distance between received wisdom and its potential efflorescence is immense. 

Students taking Mosaic Studies are likely to be thought leaders and practitioners in the renaissance of an art form, whose name from the Greek means “muse of art”. Mosaic making originated in ancient times and then peaked in medieval culture, from the Byzantines through the Umayyads as far as the Forbidden City in Beijing. There was also a flowering in Aztec and Inca civilisations.

In our contemporary context with much material concrete in urban developments, we need mosaicists who can add the colour, detail and character to building that will attract travellers of the future. One of the reasons we go somewhere is to see. If there is little of interest other than similar concrete buildings everywhere to see, there is much less reason to travel. Yes, we also go for music, theatre and food, but the way a place looks is significant.

Through durable and interesting mosaic art we can encourage architecture’s most expressive surface to create the opulence and splendour which in previous generations we placed in our sacred structures: churches, mosques, temples and palaces.

Our highly constructive times, where engineering and science have allowed rapid and expansive projects, are crying out for a medium that is distinctive and original. The student who learns mosaic art will be building on the techniques and materials of the past, while being aware of an incredible potential to innovate and broaden the scope for this medium. For example, the scope of mosaic includes using natural stones within a region, as well as linking places to their history, while creating the heritage of the future.

In the 19th century the Arts & Crafts movement changed domestic interiors for good bringing gothic and decorative elements into previously drab interiors; now in the 21st century Mosaic Artisans are preparing to transform public spaces and the exterior of our built environment.

Thailand Rescue Points the Way Towards New Role for the Military

The problem for the military is existential.  They desperately need a new role. There are so many generals who need to be cleared out for a start. “Lions led by donkeys” is the phrase handed down from history. Perhaps there were glory days in the past when some people believed the role of the warrior was to fight another warrior and the elite believed in the creed of might is right. But these days are long gone and they are part of the myth of history.

The honest truth is that most people in most places did not fight for most of time. It was only a minority of “gangster-types” who literally murdered and stole – crimes, which the rule of law has rolled back. No amount of cover-up or glorification can get away from the basic criminality of war lords throughout history. Today it is even worse - the suicide of so many soldiers coming back from war reminds us that in despite of our newspaper and TV white wash, something is hideously wrong. The propaganda has always been similar: god is on our side, we are fighting to educate and civilise barbarians, we do this for king and country, or the enemy are part of an evil empire – it is one-sided. Today military experience is worse, because we know that 80% of casualties are civilians, an inverse of previous ages when 80% of casualties were soldiers. Today the soldier can be guaranteed that he is part of a machine that mutilates and liquidates grannies and babies – he is the monster of all time.

Do you really believe our nearest neighbours are going to invade us? That Denmark, Holland or France is itching to bite off a chunk of Kent, Norfolk or Northumberland? It is inconceivable that they will waste their time on such idiocy. Or that Poland, Germany and Austria will first invade those buffer states and then seek to come to us? Complete madness! The biggest fantasy of the generals which has the full backing of our biased media is that Russia will seek to invade us (presumably after first going through a dozen other countries). Russia really wants our water and railways perhaps – except our patriotic politicians already sold them off? Fact - Russia has never invaded Western Europe except as a defence following French or German invasion of their territory. They have enough problems in keeping their own land in shape and the nation of Tolstoy, Tchaikovsky and Kandinsky hardly needs lessons in culture from us.

The recent deal for ship building in Australia highlights another myth of the generals – that war is good for business. Sure, it is good for some private companies and individuals – but we are the mugs paying taxes for these greedy accomplices of international criminality.  The buck for your pound is absolutely minimal – one bomb on Syria would keep our art school going for three years, employing twenty people - where the outcome would be more public places made attractive. Whereas making a bomb takes a couple of weeks and employs about 10 people. Its best use would be no use (useless). Appalling profligacy of the public purse and the consequence of arms sales is legitimation for those who argue against us – your weapons have murdered our family, so we have the right to respond in kind. War breeds revenge. The wealthiest countries in the world: Singapore, Japan, Germany and Switzerland do not fight – in some instances are not allowed to fight. The USA pays for its war machine with increasing debt - $20 trillion and still counting. At some point it will crash, when the Chinese tire of American bullying.

War is very bad for morality, the rule of law and for business. It is excellent for thugs, gangsters, war lords and corrupt oligarchs. Its historic practitioners are plummeting down the scale of remembrance and are likely to drift into obscurity.

The great teachers of history, who still have large followings, were Confucius,  inventor of the Golden Rule – “do unto others as you would have them do to you”; Buddha who advocated meditation and inner peace; Jesus called the Prince of Peace; and Mohammed whose catch phrase was “Peace be with you.” These are the ones with billions of followers. Scarcely a thought is now wasted on pariahs of war. The Alexanders, the Caesars and the Bin Laden’s of criminality:  common murderers and thieves are studied in university history departments, but their credit is tending towards “studies in obscurity” and their modern counter-parts end up facing war crimes in the Hague.

So where can we channel our energy? How can we transform this belligerent strand of history? Just like the search for cures has led us through leeches and poisons towards exercise and a health service;  so  enquiry into the nature of humanity and using our strength can lift us away from death and destruction, towards creativity and exploration of the universe. If we persist with our destructive habits then we do not deserve to travel into outer space. Imagine if we were at war on the space craft Mir, the notion is absurd!

One clear place where we can channel our energy is into sport. What a great spectacle the World Cup has proved. Many people paid to watch Wimbledon or visit the route of Tour de France. Thousands of athletes train for the Olympics every four years. They have physios and doctors on hand if they have an accident or injury. How much better is all this international effort than wasting energy on war?

The new role for our armed forces is to become Rescue Services. Sure, our armed forces will retain capability to defend Britain, if Denmark or some other nation led by a maverick chose to attack us. But aside from this unlikely eventuality, there is plenty to do in terms of supporting those in need. Look at the kids stuck in a cave near Chiang Rai in Thailand. Wan’t it great that British cavers found them alive and supported the efforts to free them? There is much credit to our compatriots’ skills and bravery in finding them. This is the news we should aim for, here is a new role for our armed forces.

Where fires have raged on Saddleworth Moor and around Bolton – now there’s a genuine task for the army. A quick response to fires whether they are here or in California, Portugal or Australia. Let’s develop the equipment and skills to tackle blazes. And next year it could be floods in Somerset or in the Thames Valley, or South Wales or Cornwall  – perhaps another consequence of us selling off our environment to those interested in making money. Let’s find new tasks fit for heroes! Helping those in Guatemala after the volcano erupts, or re-building Nepal after the earthquake, or rescuing the Haitians after a tornado, or the fishing villages of Sri Lanka after a Tsunami, or those in the environs of Fukushima after the nuclear power station blew up. These are all major missions that our military should be re-calibrated to engage.

Clear out the generals with their outdated and dangerous opinions and double the squaddies pay. It may mean our defence budget has to rise to 3% of government expenditure, but the added value will generate a positive view of the UK in the world; whereas now our defence strategy leads to greater insecurity, more risk to citizens, economic depression and dragging the name of Britain through mire.

Welcome for Artificial Intelligence (AI): Bring it on

I have the impression that those who are pessimistic about AI believe that human nature is essentially bad. Perhaps we are more likely to be explorers and creators. If you think Artificial Intelligence (AI) is bad for you, perhaps you read the press? Perhaps you live in a war zone, called your front room where the TV is showing you snippets of war every hour on the news? Perhaps you have financial interests in maintaining our current culture and fear its transformation into something more rational and fair?

The master/slave relationship which underpinned all empires (and all of them have fallen) is making a come-back by reviving slavery through debt bondage. Dressed up as “financial services” the tentacles of debt are strangling our imaginations and poisoning opportunities. Finance is the cancerous core of our productivity dilemma – there are people filching off the hard work most of us do. Almost everything is being financialised and free services withdrawn. Soon they’ll even charge you for education, or for living in a house built by your Nan! Hang on a minute, they already do! Basic human needs such as using a toilet, or having a drink of water, or playing in a park or on a beach – everywhere you look it’s become another excuse for the monetisers to stick on a price. Even taxation is seen as an excuse to add another cost: to make a phone call, talk to a government advisor (whose wage we already pay), to submit your tax return. We pay government to make us pay even more: bonkers!! No wonder subjects/citizens are at best cynical.

Slavery is creeping back and AI can halt this. Swathes of unnecessary economy can be liberated with a few algorithms. Bring them on.

The cruellest case of slavery’s return is with student nurses, who spend most of their time on the job and are now being charged to work! Their nurses’ homes sold off to make millions for private developers. Here the utter banality of our current muddled thinking is laid bare. One can imagine how many rich people, plagued by their own inhumanity, must hang out contemplating suicide.

The housing market is riddled with slavery’s smear. Rigging and hiking rents to exorbitant amounts, with landlords and agents allowing properties to decay, taking money out and putting nothing back, while forcing tenants to organise and make repairs, or interview new tenants, who are charged a joining fee when the work was actually done by an existing slave (otherwise called a tenant).

It is no wonder that criminal slavery is on the increase when government and property owners who are already the beneficiaries of our oh-so-limited democracy, have their itchy hands rummaging through our pockets.

Bring on the day when artificial intelligence and a couple of rigorously ethical algorithms can free us from the bondage of these impiously perverted markets: banking and property, more aptly named bonking popinjays. Their strands need a haircut and nit-combing to free us from lice. We do this in their interests, because many of them hate their jobs. They should be disgusted by their own lifestyle, which pollutes our planet, inspiring everyone else’s dismay.

Let’s look at one city – Swansea, where there are many examples of government corruption from all sides of the political spectrum. No doubt this paradigm is echoed in towns and cities throughout the country, especially where people have amassed legal ownership of multiple properties. Firstly: the Swansea Bay Tidal Lagoon could provide the city with one hundred years of energy, and be a world leading pilot for other home grown energy sources to free us from our addiction to oil. You just watch how the same people who bailed out the banks to the tune of £750 billion won’t spend even £1 billion on backing our greenest and cleanest. Secondly, the Bloodhound Supersonic Car is waiting to be test run – it could literally start its attempts at the world speed record within a month. But our government and the bonkers lack the guts, will and moral fibre to invest in our brightest and best. Why not sell them all off to the highest bidder! Like we did with our motor and rail industries.

Perhaps we should replace greed in our culture, through artificial intelligence, with an algorithm that logs each financial transaction and takes off an agreed fair percentage to fund our health, defence, education and building services.

Oh and our defence services should be in Guatemala today (June 2018), helping victims of the volcano there, and never ever bombing grannies and babies in Syria (in despite of the generals' denials). Why don’t we clear out the generals and double the squaddies pay? Let’s re-invent our armed forces, and turn them into Rescue Services, to fight forest fires in Australia and California, re-build homes for earthquake victims in Nepal; support the stranded from Tsunamis in Japan, rescue those drowning from the floods in Somerset, help the homeless from hurricanes in Haiti – now there’s some jobs fit for heroes.

Grenfell Tower Legacy

Sometimes it feels as if there is a contagion spreading through our culture and it’s only a matter of time before we have another accident and emergency.  It seems as if wherever possible those with resource and power are winkling away for a little bit more money, so that even the law is for sale. Did you know you have to pay a premium now to phone the Home Office for advice? What do we pay taxes for if government has become a business? Anyone wanting to innovate or find a foothold has to jump through concocted hoops. The concoctions may have origins in alleged good practice, but monetising good practice is wrong. Good practice should be given as a standard for free.

Here’s an example of one of today’s conundrums. You can fly on a safe flight for 4500 miles from Lagos to London for £400; but if you wanted to cross the 290 miles from Libya to safety in Italy you might pay thousands of pounds for an extremely dangerous journey. Who is responsible for bringing the inequality that drives this chaos in travel?

The toil of everyday life is such that we often forget how fortunate we are to live in a time of peace and plenty. It wasn’t always like this and in a few places around the world it still is very tough.

So the Grenfell Tower catastrophe shows us what happens when things go wrong and how we respond. The system we have developed has become supremely adept at shifting the blame, when all we need to understand is why vast sums of money were spent making life worse and more dangerous? What culture have we cultivated to make such inflammation?

This is an opportunity for us to find a way to free local authoritarians, whether in business or government, from their sense of knowing best and change their stance to being public facing and acting in public interest. This private greed, insane competition, with the coining it by lazy landlords and oligarchs has gone too far! We need to free those who hold the reins from this out of control cartel.

And the accounting must be more than at a general election, because that is too occasional and the politicians have just become the fall-guys for a rotten system, backed up by fake news and corrupt money. The news is awful: murderer + terror plot + terrible accident + gaff by government + miracle cure by big pharma + royal story + sporting triumph or loss. Who gives a toss anymore?

Officials are defensive because they often have to put up with abusive language and negative perceptions. The powerless public imitate the puppet politicians. There is an impasse. One side feeling defensive and knee-jerking they know best, while the other side feels like mugs being conned for tax or fees by people who serve themselves before serving the community. If we can salvage something from Grenfell Tower in terms of identifying a series of negative premises and move forward towards more genuine local control over local affairs, building on the many good aspects of our system, then that would be a step forward.

The rise of local authoritarians is not necessarily a normal character trait; rather it is how people react in a pointlessly stressful environment, when they have unnecessary tasks to fulfil without the resources to do them. “We don’t have any money” is the mantra of those who are paid a decent salary to work for public good. It also masks the reality they have plenty of money although it is being misspent. Many people who have become local authoritarians started out with idealistic aims to do a good job. Unfortunately the diversion of funds (austerity) from the poor to the rich (£750 billion given to the banks who caused the 2007 economic crisis) means that while a few random greedy folk are becoming exceptionally rich, most people see their income stagnating or dwindling. In the end local authoritarians are stripped of the means to do their job and they resort to obfuscation, evasion and ensuring that no one can make them responsible for any action.

Local residents hold the real power, except we let others take it away from us. Our so-called democratic system is better than the monarchy which preceded it (because we don’t have to kill the king to change him), but we shouldn’t kid ourselves by thinking we are much different from other forms of oligarchy in Russia, China or America. Yes, we may have this quirk or that Black Rod to protect our liberties, but people elsewhere also get by and build on the legacy of Tchaikovsky, Ming ceramics and Martin Luther King to understand and celebrate their culture. Yes, we do have a nominal break clause, an election every five years, but this is often circumvented through media’s self-preserving propaganda and control, corrupt party systems which openly insult and lie about their opponents, and the requirement to amass a fortune or have a stroke of immense luck to be in the right place at the right time with an attitude that relishes standing in an abusive process.

Where are we now? Immeasurably better than one hundred years ago when we were still slugging it out in the trenches of the first world war. But how is it that the housing situation in those days was so much better? That the houses being built would last for at least one hundred years and more. That you could be given a council house when you wanted to start a family, or could buy a home for a few hundred pounds? That you could trust that those who built your home weren’t trying to fiddle a buck! Somehow or other we have lost our way and turned ourselves from a making and producing culture into sitting at desks tapping into computers, like carrion vultures.

What happens on the front line for council officers?

  • Incredible pressure is put on front-line staff who have to face a disgruntled public

  • Line management systems with many meetings where blame is absolved by ensuring the matter has been dealt with, by an unfortunate front-line member of staff being given another nominal task. An email is sent and a record kept as evidence that the matter has been referred on.

  • Telling residents their concerns are being mulled over by experts/senior people

  • Telling residents there are medium term plans to knock down their residence

  • Telling residents there are exciting plans for an indeterminate future, where their dreams can be realised with far better facilities to come, apart from the decade when their community will be dispersed (and cleansed).

  • Telling residents that the new schemes are great value for money and will improve the quality of their life

Residents then

  • Feel demoralised

  • Do not want to invest time, effort or money in their current situation

  • Are utterly bored by meetings where nothing is resolved and no action follows

  • Feel threatened by events and let down by the “system”

  • Keep their head down and accept whatever happens in a curmudgeonly way

  • Occasionally dream of the swimming pool that is never built

Surely we can do better than this! For all the data we amass and all the hands which could be put to better use, couldn’t we build enough homes for our people to live in? Couldn’t we provide the education people need to lead a fulfilled life? Couldn’t we release the 70% of people who dislike their job into something more purposeful and worthwhile? Couldn’t we move away from insult and diatribe, towards discussion and problem solving? Couldn’t we turn our money from a debt based system into credit, where credit is due?

For a thousand years and more we have put up buildings that have become our villages, towns and cities. Every building was put up by our forbearers who worked in groups to achieve what we now have as their legacy. I would be surprised if there was any building in the whole land ever put up by one man or woman. Why can’t we share the credit for what our forbearers gave to us? Why have we so distorted our property system that the builders who construct our buildings are paid once and much less than those who work in financial services who seem to be paid on and on for work that has already been done, just because we have concocted the notion they own a property. Something is wrong when the highly rigged market is systematically working against our young people who cannot even imagine ever owning a home. Something is wrong when we’ve organised a process where we pay people who never laid a brick, instead of training and paying the home builders we need working for us today.

We have to find a way out of this rip-off culture and instead take practical steps for a stronger and more sensible future where villages, towns and cities are there for people and communities, and where markets sell products we can hold onto or at least eat, instead of being in hoc to a financial system which siphons off money from the many for the few. We need to face the truth that although the city employs people, it creates jobs for people who hate their job. Let’s welcome artificial intelligence which will enable us to put fairness into financial algorithms which will then lead financiers into worthwhile jobs.